| < |
Novus Ordo |
Rejecting Holy Apostolic Tradition by corrupting the liturgy:
BISHOP SCHNEIDER ASKS POPE LEO TO HEAL THE HISTORY OF THE CHURCH-:-TOWARDS THE REAL VATICAN 2
19:30: During Vatican II; only psalm 42 and the last Gospel were removed
21:20: Two years later in 67 the first senate of bishops where the members were almost all still council fathers those participants in 67. These were more or less more than 100 bishops were all uh two years ago still members of the council. And when father bugini presented them the no order as we have it today almost this form to them the majority rejected it. This is this is a fact. It is hidden. It is silenced. It is removed from and this I think we must again state these two facts. And in spite of this, Bugini made these uh tactics and revolution with his friends and with with his friendship with Paul V 6 and implemented basically a revolutionary mass which is not at all the mass of Vatican 2.
Eye-witnesses that testify this baseless Mass:
Bishop Athanasius Schneider: Cardinal Roche’s Liturgy Report Is “Manipulative” and Distorts History:
1. Joseph Ratzinger
“The problem of the new Missal lies in the fact that it breaks away from this continuous history—one that progressed uninterrupted both before and after Pius V—and creates an entirely new book, whose appearance is accompanied by a type of prohibition of what previously existed that is wholly foreign to the history of Church law and liturgy. From my knowledge of the conciliar debates and from a renewed reading of the speeches delivered at that time by the Council Fathers, I can state with certainty that this was not intended.” (Joseph Ratzinger 1976 letter to Professor Wolfgang Waldstein)
Archimandrite Boniface Luykx (liturgical scholar, a peritus at the Second Vatican Council and a member of the Vatican liturgical commission (the so-called Consilium) led by Fr. Annibale Bugnini): “Behind these revolutionary exaggerations were hidden three typically Western but false principles: (1) the concept (à la Bugnini) of the superiority and normative value of modern Western man and his culture for all other cultures; (2) the inevitable and tyrannical law of constant change that some theologians applied to the liturgy, Church teaching, exegesis, and theology; and (3) the primacy of the horizontal” (A Wider View of Vatican II, Angelico Press, 2025, p. 131).
“There was a perfect continuity between the preconciliar period and the Council itself, but after the Council this crucial continuity was broken by the postconciliar commissions. … The Novus Ordo is not faithful to CSL [Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy] but goes substantially beyond the parameters which CSL set for the reform of the Mass rite. … The steamroller of man-centered horizontalism (as opposed to God-centered verticalism) has flattened all liturgical forms after Vatican II, but its main victim is the Novus Ordo. … The main loser in this process is the mystery, which should be, on the contrary, the main object and content of the celebration” (pp. 80, 98, 104).
2. Archimandrite Boniface Luykx (member of the mass reform commission (concilium))
See book.3. Cardinal Antonelli (member of the council; member of the concilium)
See: BISHOP SCHNEIDER ASKS POPE LEO TO HEAL THE HISTORY OF THE CHURCH-:-TOWARDS THE REAL VATICAN 2